I didn’t have the nerve to say no..
Except that surely there’s a case for any political party that truly believes in its vision and manifesto to say ‘no’ to any deal that compromises the fundamental rationale for a party’s existence ? All the bravehearts at the back wake up please.. I find it incredible that a Scottish National Party would even consider fudging an independence vote and somehow seek to govern by looking for legislative ideas from other parties and accepting that most of their manifesto can’t be delivered – that’s minority rule I guess…. Whither now for the Labour party in Scotland ? Cobbling together a deal to keep the SNP out of government isnt the answer – it’ll be interesting to see what sort of government a party of fundamentalists but gradualists , city but rural, business friendly but quasi socialist , all things to all people party can put together by way of an administration… At the same time we (ie: Labour) could have a mature debate about revisiting the devolution settlement and the Scotland Act about fiscal autonomy, more legislative powers and more devolution to local government – the sky won’t fall in if we did…
-
Archives
- June 2009 (1)
- May 2009 (1)
- December 2008 (2)
- November 2008 (4)
- October 2008 (5)
- July 2008 (6)
- May 2008 (3)
- April 2008 (3)
- February 2008 (3)
- January 2008 (3)
- December 2007 (5)
- November 2007 (6)
-
Categories
- Apprenticeships
- Area Committees
- Books
- Broomhill
- Cleansing
- Commonwealth Games
- Council
- Council tax
- councillor
- Elections
- Equality
- Finance
- Fire Service
- Football
- General Election
- General Message
- Glasgow
- Glasgow Harbour
- Greens
- health
- Housing
- Jordanhill
- Labour party
- LibDems
- Local Issues: Supermarkets
- Mansfield Park
- music
- New Zealand
- Parking
- Parks
- Partick
- Planning
- Post Office
- Recycling
- Scottish Futures Trust
- SNP
- South Africa
- Tesco
- Thornwood
- Tories
- Uncategorized
- US Elections
- Victoria Park
- West End
- Whiteinch
-
RSS
Entries RSS
Comments RSS